Ideas for Documenting Quality Community-Engaged Scholarship in a Dossier
This material is excerpted from: Jordan C. (Editor) (2007). Community-Engaged Scholarship Review, Promotion & Tenure Package. Peer Review Workgroup, Community-Engaged Scholarship for Health Collaborative, Community-Campus Partnerships for Health, with permission from Community-Campus Partnerships for Health.
Complete document available at http://depts.washington.edu/ccph/pdf_files/CES_RPT_Package.pdf
- Career Statement
- Curriculum Vita
- Statement of Assigned Responsibilities
- Teaching Portfolios
- Letters of Support/Appreciation from Community Members/Partners
- Peer Review Letters from Community Leaders
- Publications in Media Aimed at Community Partners
- Peer-Reviewed Publications that Report on Community-Engaged Scholarship
- Enhancing Scientific Rigor in Research Through Community Engagement
- Enhancing Teaching Through Community Engagement
The following are examples of documents that could be included in a community-engaged scholar’s dossier, as well as two tables discussing the enhancement and documentation of community-engaged research and teaching.
Depending upon an academic institution’s standards and guidelines for preparing promotion and tenure materials, some of these may or may not be useful to individual scholars. Thus, community-engaged scholars are encouraged to use these ideas in the context of the requirements of the institutions in which they work.
For additional ideas, including examples from actual dossiers, visit the Community-Engaged Scholarship (CES) Toolkit.
1. Career StatementAs a part of their career statement, scholars can discuss the role of CES to their career and academic development. Some institutions require the scholar to specifically address research and teaching accomplishments in either subsections of the Career Statement or in separate essays. The scholar should take this opportunity to illustrate how CES enhances the rigor of their research or teaching, the reach of their work, community impact, and student outcomes. |
2. Curriculum VitaWithin the format allowed by their institutions, community-engaged scholars can use their vita to highlight the importance of community-engagement to their scholarly work. For example, sections of the vita could be developed to highlight community activities, consultative and advisory positions, and articles or reports co-authored with community partners. It is particularly important that the role of community partners be highlighted. It is essential that community-engaged scholars document their work to be scholarly, in that it creates, advances, or extends knowledge. Mere provision of community service, while being a form of community engagement, cannot be considered to be CES. Ideas from the CES Toolkit include:
|
3. Statement of Assigned Responsibilities/Work AssignmentCommunity-engaged scholars can also document the importance of community-engagement as it relates to their assigned responsibilities. Sadly, in many academic settings, faculty members are evaluated for promotion and tenure on criteria that are out of alignment with the responsibilities they are asked to assume on a daily basis. Inclusion of a statement of assigned responsibilities or work assignment, within a dossier, may call attention to the importance of community-engagement as it relates to a scholar’s work. |
4. Teaching PortfoliosTeaching portfolios are increasingly used by faculty members for documentation of the scholarship of teaching. Portfolios are ideal venues for faculty members to document the value of community-engagement as related to their teaching as well as scholarship related to their teaching activities. Important components of teaching portfolios are the scholar’s reflective comments, which can be used to explain the value of community-engaged approaches to their work. Ideas from the CES Toolkit include:
|
5. Letters of Support/Appreciation from Community Members/PartnersSuch letters can be used to help document the value of the scholarly work as perceived by community leaders and to illustrate community impact and breadth of dissemination. |
6. Peer Review Letters from Community LeadersTo be valuable, such letters must provide a critical critique of the scholar’s work from the community’s perspective. Letters of a general nature that lack critical analysis may be counterproductive to the scholar’s promotion and/or tenure application. |
7. Publications in Media Aimed at Community PartnersSuch publications can be used to highlight the importance of this work to community leaders and partners. |
8. Peer-Reviewed Publications that Report on Community-Engaged ScholarshipPeer-reviewed publications are the most highly respected forms of scholarly communication. It is important that community-engaged scholars, when ever possible, work diligently to communicate their work through peer-reviewed outlets. For example, CES4Health.info is a new online mechanism for peer-reviewed publication and dissemination of products of CES that are in forms other than journal articles. |
9. Enhancing Scientific Rigor in Research Through Community EngagementOrganized by key phases in the research process, this table presents ways that engagement enhances the scientific process and ideas for activities and methods of documenting those activities that would illustrate for a RPT committee the rigor of a candidate’s engaged work. |
10. Enhancing Teaching Through Community EngagementThis table presents is ways to organize key steps in the teaching process, ways that engagement enhances the teaching process and ideas for activities and methods of documenting those activities that would illustrate for a RPT committee the scholarship of a candidate’s engaged work. |